Stirling Grand Responsive Template

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

17 Oct 2013, 07:46 PM
picaflor-azul

Re: Stirling Grand Responsive Template

Quote:

Originally Posted by rbarbour

After further playing with:

I was able to keep the current onHover intact without the use of first using onClick. Therefore onHover will be default and if one is using a touch device the onClick will be the fall back.

It looks great ;) Thank you for posting, it seems like an ideal solution!

Thanks,

Anne
17 Oct 2013, 09:14 PM
DivaVocals

Re: Stirling Grand Responsive Template

Quote:

Originally Posted by rbarbour

After further playing with:

I was able to keep the current onHover intact without the use of first using onClick. Therefore onHover will be default and if one is using a touch device the onClick will be the fall back.

I'm on a mobile phone can't look at it right now, but can this code also be applied to the categories generator class that is used by the mega menu?
18 Oct 2013, 03:24 PM
RixStix

Re: Stirling Grand Responsive Template
Quote:

Originally Posted by rbarbour

After further playing with:

I was able to keep the current onHover intact without the use of first using onClick. Therefore onHover will be default and if one is using a touch device the onClick will be the fall back.

Is touch device functionality related to internet connection speed? If so, that could affect what I am seeing. Rural area with a 1Mb connection on a good day.

MegaMenu checks
- Windows 8 pro, HP Envy-X2 tablet, FireFox: much better for touch screen use
- Windows 8 pro, HP Envy-X2 tablet, IE10 desktop: no touchscreen functionality
- Windows 8 pro, HP Envy-X2 tablet, IE10 app: not tested
- Windows 8 RT, MSFT SurfaceRT, IE10 desktop: no touchscreen functionality
- Windows 8 RT, MSFT SurfaceRT, IE10 app: no touchscreen functionality
It will be a while before having Windows 8.1 since the 3.63GB download will take almost 7 hours if there is no hiccup in the connection.
18 Oct 2013, 06:03 PM
DivaVocals

Re: Stirling Grand Responsive Template
Quote:
Originally Posted by RixStix

Is touch device functionality related to internet connection speed? If so, that could affect what I am seeing. Rural area with a 1Mb connection on a good day.

MegaMenu checks

Windows 8 pro, HP Envy-X2 tablet, FireFox: much better for touch screen use
Windows 8 pro, HP Envy-X2 tablet, IE10 desktop: no touchscreen functionality
Windows 8 pro, HP Envy-X2 tablet, IE10 app: not tested
Windows 8 RT, MSFT SurfaceRT, IE10 desktop: no touchscreen functionality
Windows 8 RT, MSFT SurfaceRT, IE10 app: no touchscreen functionality

It will be a while before having Windows 8.1 since the 3.63GB download will take almost 7 hours if there is no hiccup in the connection.
Your test cases don't appear valid.. what is IE10 desktop vs IE10 app? Also your testing is putting weight on connection speed when the only differences in your testcase scenarios is the device and the browser..
18 Oct 2013, 06:49 PM
RixStix

Re: Stirling Grand Responsive Template

Quote:

Originally Posted by DivaVocals

Your test cases don't appear valid.. what is IE10 desktop vs IE10 app? Also your testing is putting weight on connection speed when the only differences in your testcase scenarios is the device and the browser..

Don't know what you mean about validity. I saw what I saw. I have seen differences with screen presentations when IE10 is launched as an APP from a Tile on the Start screen vs IE10 launched as from the Desktop Taskbar.

Connection speed was just a statement of present conditions just in case it had an effect on functionality. Not everyone has blindingly fast connections.
18 Oct 2013, 10:46 PM
DivaVocals

Re: Stirling Grand Responsive Template

Quote:

Originally Posted by RixStix

Don't know what you mean about validity. I saw what I saw. I have seen differences with screen presentations when IE10 is launched as an APP from a Tile on the Start screen vs IE10 launched as from the Desktop Taskbar.Connection speed was just a statement of present conditions just in case it had an effect on functionality. Not everyone has blindingly fast connections.

How an application is launched should not affect behavior unless the app icon/tile launches a completely different browser program, OR possibly launches the browser program with different startup settings. Either way sounds more like a function of the browser issue/difference than the device.. connection speed also rarely affects functionality.. connection speed will affect performance. which is to say that the results you got would likely repeat for someone testing the same testcases on the same devices.. just faster..
19 Oct 2013, 12:29 AM
RixStix

Re: Stirling Grand Responsive Template

Quote:

Originally Posted by DivaVocals

How an application is launched should not affect behavior unless the app icon/tile launches a completely different browser program,

Sorry but MSFT packages two different "experiences" of IE within Windows 8

"For better or worse, IE10 is one of those Windows 8 apps with a split personality--part Metro and part desktop. Microsoft dubs it a "Metro style enabled desktop browser," which means that technically it's a single app that offers two different "experiences." CNET article

Ditto for IE11.

I should have said IE11 desktop and IE11 Metro instead of IE10 desktop and IE10APP. Regardless of my technically incorrect terminology, the experience is different.
19 Oct 2013, 02:48 AM
DivaVocals

Re: Stirling Grand Responsive Template

Understood so it is exactly what I stated.. basically two different experience is based on how you launch it.. This still means that the behavior you find is more of a function of the browser app and not the device

Quote:

Originally Posted by RixStix

Sorry but MSFT packages two different "experiences" of IE within Windows 8

"For better or worse, IE10 is one of those Windows 8 apps with a split personality--part Metro and part desktop. Microsoft dubs it a "Metro style enabled desktop browser," which means that technically it's a single app that offers two different "experiences." CNET article

Ditto for IE11.

I should have said IE11 desktop and IE11 Metro instead of IE10 desktop and IE10APP. Regardless of my technically incorrect terminology, the experience is different.
19 Oct 2013, 03:02 PM
rbarbour

Re: Stirling Grand Responsive Template
Quote:
Originally Posted by RixStix

Is touch device functionality related to internet connection speed? If so, that could affect what I am seeing. Rural area with a 1Mb connection on a good day.

MegaMenu checks

Windows 8 pro, HP Envy-X2 tablet, FireFox: much better for touch screen use
Windows 8 pro, HP Envy-X2 tablet, IE10 desktop: no touchscreen functionality
Windows 8 pro, HP Envy-X2 tablet, IE10 app: not tested
Windows 8 RT, MSFT SurfaceRT, IE10 desktop: no touchscreen functionality
Windows 8 RT, MSFT SurfaceRT, IE10 app: no touchscreen functionality

It will be a while before having Windows 8.1 since the 3.63GB download will take almost 7 hours if there is no hiccup in the connection.
A. A touch screens functionality has nothing to do with internet speed connection.

B. This is a template support thread, not a support thread for DEVICES or BROWSERS.

C. Any IE will require additional coding of some sort cause IE sucks for phones, tablets and desktops.
19 Oct 2013, 03:04 PM
rbarbour

Re: Stirling Grand Responsive Template

Quote:

Originally Posted by DivaVocals

I'm on a mobile phone can't look at it right now, but can this code also be applied to the categories generator class that is used by the mega menu?

Just updated the the example and YES it will work with the categories_ul_generator file. I will forward those changes to Anne as well.

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page