Quote Originally Posted by mprough View Post
No, init_image_handler (below) is not removed.
But the auto-loader file which executes it is.




Quote Originally Posted by mprough View Post
Correct, but it hadn't the ability to make directories and write file before either... which is a whole new ballgame.
Not that new since the code that creates the files and directories in the bmz_cache folder writes directories and files too..

Quote Originally Posted by mprough View Post
deletion of the .bak file was reported to me by a colleague, first the other day.... I only had time to mess around with it today, but she was correct. delete the files and the module is disabled.
if you delete them BEFORE you install the add-on then no you're right.. the install won't work. You can easily delete the .BAK files created by the install in the template directories with no issues whatsoever.

Quote Originally Posted by mprough View Post
Wasn't beating you up re the thread... but none the less should have been present as I was already instructed as well =) How would I possibly know you knew that?
Wasn't expecting you to know at all nor was I feeling beat up.. I was simply responding to your inquiry about the .BAK files to let you know I'd been made aware of the issue and it will be addressed in the next update.



Quote Originally Posted by mprough View Post
Cannot install without the .bak files and even then although installed was not functioning. I actually did this 5 times.
My servers will not even allow the creation/storage of .bak files unless a mime type is created... as it should be according to the PCi guys.
Again.. got it, and will be addressed in the next release..


Quote Originally Posted by mprough View Post
I just want to be able to use this and install it myself w/o creating issues. It is a very good module, but I think the installer needs to be rethought and the manual installation needs attention as many PCI compliant server cannot make .bak files, cannot use the mkdir in that way as it sets the permissions incorrectly... it will additionally never work on Win, not that I care about Win
Well I don't believe the installer truly requires a LOT of re-thinking.. The changes we need to make are fairly simple to implement, and are being addressed..