One-Page Checkout [Support Thread]

[shags38]

@lankeeyankee and Cindy - thank you both for your responses .... all is good. Just as a matter of clarification, in configuration settings what does enabling 'enable account registration' actually do? ... or is that answered in your last line Cindy? ... 'Upon order completion, a guest is given the opportunity to create an account'

cheers,
Mike

[lat9]

The OPC's Registered Accounts (which that configuration setting enables) enables your store's customers to create a slimmed-down account (no ship-to/bill-to addresses are recorded in the customer's account).

Unlike a guest-checkout, this customer has a unique customer-account with minimal data-gathering (good for GDPR). A customer with a registered account can do anything that one with a "normal" account can, except that they need to enter their address information each time they place an order.

[RixStix]

OPC 1.1.0 (yes, I know it's old but I didn't see any reference in version changes that would have addressed this particular issue)
ZC 1.5.4

When checking out using store credit funds and store credit funds exceed order total, a payment type is required even though the balance due is $0. Resulting in endless loop (from customer comment)

Use Store Credit funds minus one cent and selecting payment type completes order as expected.

[lat9]

Could you provide a link to the Store Credits module that you're using, Rick?

[RixStix]

AFAIK, it is the store credit that is built in ???

I may have 'changed' the words 'gift certificate' to 'store credit'. Need to get through first coffee of the day and I'll check.

TNX Cindy

[RixStix]

Could you provide a link to the Store Credits module that you're using, Rick?

Built in GV code with text labels renamed to Store Credit

Since we have a 100% manual admin intervention rate for built in Gift Certificates, we changed the labels. Zero customers have been able to follow the instructions for GV redemption via automated system.

[RixStix]

Was that GIT issue #85?

that I missed?

[lat9]

Was that GIT issue #85?

that I missed?

Most likely. That change was incorporated into OPC v1.2.0 and later.