visual verification

[Ajeh]

Again, Oracle, if you have an add-on you wish to contribute, do so ...

But please do not just talk about it or tell people it exists if you are not putting it in the contributions ...

Otherwise, those who would like to use it are frustrated ... as well as those working on similar add-ons for the same purpose ...

Helping is nice ... making add-ons is nice ... contributing to the community is nice ...

But if you are all talk and no action, then it really isn't helping anyone is it ...

[TheOracle]

But please do not just talk about it or tell people it exists if you are not putting it in the contributions ...

In that case, you're asking me to lie over users who are requesting a feature that I might of probably built already (since it isn't in the contributions section on anyhow).

Meaning - better to tell the truth about it rather than lie about it.

Besides, it is not because I have it that, from your perspective, I absolutely have to upload it under your contribution. In the end, I have, again, responded to the requester.

[Ajeh]

You inferred in your post it is not available because you have not distributed it yet ...

That rather implied to me that you:

1 had it done

2 planned to distribute it

3 did not have people beg you for it on your thread so why bother until they do

[Typhoon]

So this visual verification exists ? Are you running it on your site ? If so, please tell me where I can download the zip-file containing all the files/whole code with the instruction how to install it on my site, I really are in need for something like this...

Thanx,

/Typhoon

[TheOracle]

If so, please tell me where I can download the zip-file containing all the files/whole code with the instruction how to install it on my site

Unfortunitely, it is not anywhere on the site (yet).

I really are in need for something like this...

It would also be great if the DEV Team would decide to integrate such feature for the next release which I have been trying to know from the wishlist section but not a word about it so far.

[TheOracle]

Sorry. Forgot to answer these questions:

So this visual verification exists ?

Yes, it does.

Are you running it on your site ?

On my test site, yes - it is.

[Typhoon]

If so, please tell me where I can download the zip-file containing all the files/whole code with the instruction how to install it on my site, I really are in need for something like this...

Thanx,

/Typhoon

And, finally, the last and most important question... ^^^^^^^^^^^^

/Typhoon

[TheOracle]

I thought this was answered two threads above ...

However, I was just asking, first, if this was really what you were looking for since I wasn't sure of what kind of protection would were looking for precisely.

[Typhoon]

Yes, this is what I am looking for, but the question was if you please could tell me "where I can download the zip-file containing all the files/whole code with the instruction how to install it on my site, I really are in need for something like this..." ?

/Typhoon

[TheOracle]

where I can download the zip-file containing all the files/whole code with the instruction how to install it on my site

Ah yes, now I understand your point. Well, I did not downloaded this package from this forum but from another location and I had to make the implementation myself under all the HTML forms within Zen-Cart. Which is why, it wouldn't be as easy as you think to give support or to give specific instructions over customized modules and templates since I wouldn't ... pretty much ... know how exacly you customized your readings as this could end into ... yes ... disastrous results since ... how would I know where exacly would you want to add these restrictions on your site ? (Including the fact that, may be not you, but other users might already used implemented contributions)

So, to make this short, no specific instructions came with this package as you must find under which files you'd like to add these restrictions from your perspective. I think it would be best if the DEV Team would implement this kind of feature.

Otherwise, 'x's are gonna post big to 'y'.