Problem with Product Images

[torvista]

ok, I'll sit corrected.

The inconsistency depending on location seems incorrect, and the allowing-anything-after-the-basename is a hole which has lead to this thread.

For me, the big picture is the core image-handling process seems very unwieldly for 2024...

[lat9]

ok, I'll sit corrected.

The inconsistency depending on location seems incorrect, and the allowing-anything-after-the-basename is a hole which has lead to this thread.

For me, the big picture is the core image-handling process seems very unwieldly for 2024...

I agree that it's inconsistent, but making that change would result in sites that "followed the rules" for years having to go back and rename any additional images for images present in the root /images directory.

[dbltoe]

How about providing a switch somewhat similar to the option of 0 vs 3 in columns for bootstrap?

I feel this was wrong from the start and that fact is not a very good reason for continuing.

Still trying to find code and fix.

[dbltoe]

What is so frustrating to figure out is that any product found by searching 11 has the "problem".

Any product found by searching for 01 does not.