Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 30 of 30
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    10,569
    Plugin Contributions
    25

    Default Re: 1.2.x to 1.3.x = redesign required?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kim
    Sorry- you'll have to take that up with the designer. :)

    Langer- the template default does validate.
    So does "future Zen" (boy do I regret that name) as it is just template default with a revised stylesheet, a handful of images and the define statements for its template_info file.

    http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht...Fzc1301test%2F

    Personally, I'm finding upgrading sites from 1.2 to 1.3 relatively straightforward, and almost always easiest to do by rebuilding them based on template default rather than trying to convert the template, so hopefully future compatibility shouldn't be too much of a problem. The challenge, as Kim says, comes when somebody has made extensive changes to the underlying code.

    P.S. It does however, mean letting go of table-based design philosophies.
    Last edited by kuroi; 28 Jun 2006 at 09:35 AM.
    Kuroi Web Design and Development | Twitter

    (Questions answered in the forum only - so that any forum member can benefit - not by personal message)

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    1,378
    Plugin Contributions
    1

    Default Re: 1.2.x to 1.3.x = redesign required?

    here's my re-work of the xhtml classic template from the downloads. Seems pretty resilient across firefox, konqueror and IE. If anyone can find a browser that it can't handle, please let me know.

    http://nicholaskeown.com/zc130/

    I'll make it available for download soon, though mosst changes are in the CSS.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    10,569
    Plugin Contributions
    25

    Default Re: 1.2.x to 1.3.x = redesign required?

    Quote Originally Posted by langer
    here's my re-work of the xhtml classic template from the downloads. Seems pretty resilient across firefox, konqueror and IE. If anyone can find a browser that it can't handle, please let me know.
    Nice work. Personally I find the classic design a bit boxy and dated, but this is a good implementation of it that will hopefully help users who feel comfortable with this look, but want to avoid the problems that come with using the "Classic Template".
    Kuroi Web Design and Development | Twitter

    (Questions answered in the forum only - so that any forum member can benefit - not by personal message)

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    38
    Plugin Contributions
    0

    Default Re: 1.2.x to 1.3.x = redesign required?

    I am unable to get any template to work in 1.3.+.

    Even by copying the deafault tempalte folder in its entirity, pages are messed up, pics are gone, even the css doesnt look like its working, as the are very few items that math from the deafault tempalte.

    Nuts.. thinking of swinging back over to 1.2+, even though I really really need the EzPages utility.. the time I've spent trying to find a work around I could have spent better on adding a few pages manually.

    However, I do love and appreciaite what you guys @ Zen do, believ its a religion in its own right.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    10,569
    Plugin Contributions
    25

    Default Re: 1.2.x to 1.3.x = redesign required?

    Quote Originally Posted by sprogy
    I am unable to get any template to work in 1.3.+.

    Even by copying the deafault tempalte folder in its entirity, pages are messed up, pics are gone, even the css doesnt look like its working, as the are very few items that math from the deafault tempalte.

    Nuts.. thinking of swinging back over to 1.2+, even though I really really need the EzPages utility.. the time I've spent trying to find a work around I could have spent better on adding a few pages manually.

    However, I do love and appreciaite what you guys @ Zen do, believ its a religion in its own right.
    Do you mean that you can't get any 1.2 templates to work in 1.3 (which wouldn't be a surprise, and is the point langer made at the header of this thread), or that you can't get any of the 1.3 templates available from the downloads section on this site to work, all of which do when installed properly on a 1.3 system and none of which need workarounds?

    I recommend that you try installing future Zen (not because I wrote it) but because it it was written as a lightweight template with the objective of being very easy indeed to install. SO if that doesn't work, it would yield big clues as to where the problem lies.
    Kuroi Web Design and Development | Twitter

    (Questions answered in the forum only - so that any forum member can benefit - not by personal message)

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    38
    Plugin Contributions
    0

    Default Re: 1.2.x to 1.3.x = redesign required?

    I think I've fallen in love with you.....

    Looks like i can sort it out from what you've otld me.

    Tried a few of the templates in the d/l section i KNOW i can get it sorted by using one of them and manipulating all my old stuff into it or by using newwer version of dowlaodable add ons...

    Rock on!

    Thanks.

    Dave / Sprogy / Noodles

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    38
    Plugin Contributions
    0

    Idea or Suggestion Re: 1.2.x to 1.3.x = redesign required?

    Well... I've been playing about with the site over the last 48 hours, and the CSS, and overides work a treat, and are much easier to work with than before in v1.2+.

    If your considering upgrading to 1.3+, I would suggest you d/l to a local machine, and have a play around, before you decide to make the jump..

    Inevitably, I re did the whole site from scratch [apart from the database], using a stock template from Zen Cart's download section, it involved 48 hours of work, and a lot of coffe and cigs, but it was well well worth it.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    10,569
    Plugin Contributions
    25

    Default Re: 1.2.x to 1.3.x = redesign required?

    As you say, rebuilding sites on the 1.3 base is relatively straightforward. One to three days is reasonable depending upon the complexity and any special requirements. The biggest problem is often not the site design, but whether the add-ins on the old site are compatible with 1.3.
    Kuroi Web Design and Development | Twitter

    (Questions answered in the forum only - so that any forum member can benefit - not by personal message)

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    N of San Antonio TX
    Posts
    9,179
    Plugin Contributions
    11

    Default Re: 1.2.x to 1.3.x = redesign required?

    Another thing that I've noticed throughout the threads is a botched FTP of files.

    Make it a point to verify the files after FTPing to the server BEFORE going any further.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    38
    Plugin Contributions
    0

    Default Re: 1.2.x to 1.3.x = redesign required?

    Top advice.

    Just about to sling the local stuff back to the server for action.. wish me luck!

    [of course i made a back up... now where did i put it?]

 

 
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. Radical Redesign
    By Cookiepus in forum Templates, Stylesheets, Page Layout
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 15 Apr 2011, 01:07 PM
  2. Template redesign
    By Arunachala in forum Templates, Stylesheets, Page Layout
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 25 Jan 2011, 05:56 PM
  3. total redesign
    By MNuTz in forum Templates, Stylesheets, Page Layout
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 31 Jan 2008, 07:01 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
disjunctive-egg
Zen-Cart, Internet Selling Services, Klamath Falls, OR