Quote Originally Posted by torvista View Post
I just don't want to reinvent wheels....for things that are already addressed in another branch.

Suggestions could be many, or nothing show-stopping yet.
Perhaps could raise a an issue and if already addressed then can point out the where? Right now one of the issues is that there has been an overhaul of some central processing to then also address existing issues.

I can say that one "topic" that is being worked on though not yet shown in Github is identification of database field defaults to expand on improved import capability. Unfortunately for me I have been focusing on update operations more than insert and had lost out on addressing import of product where fields were omitted. I didn't want to implement something very short term that was going to need to be undone immediately so am trying to address it in a single modification with any issues identified to be corrected.