no offence... But when it comes to topics of web security i will listen to the people that manage my 4 servers over anyone here, including Dr Byte.

as for 'crap giver' if i wanted to damage ZC or IH2 i would happily go about the internet slagging it off.. but i dont... how's about pulling your head out of your arse hole and checking the link in my sig?

i get frustrated with arrogance... and have found DV to be extremely arrogant over the 6 months. I have pointed out flaws, it takes constant nagging for these to get noticed... and only by my blackening of the IH2 name has DV arsed herself to look deeper.

UKF, UH and Don have all replied to my support ticket, reviewing this thread. Each have stated in their personal opinion that the 777 setting this current IH2 mod is creating is a security risk. UKF have even listed possible methods of attacking folders with 777.

Let me be clear, I dont use IH2, but I do care that a mod that is popular MAY be a cause for even the most minor of security problems when it can be avoided. Ask your self this.. would this 777 problem have been looked onto if I had not gone on and on and on...

WOULD IT F***!

NB, webfusion have not yet responded to my ticket, but then that the only account i have sharded server..;. it normally take 48 hrs..

now you can all get back to brown nosing DV. I dont care if i have annoyed upset ppl in this thread.. simply because i feel it was nessessary to get the dam thing looked into.. and it worked!