Quote Originally Posted by mc12345678 View Post
Doesn't matter if the questions as perceived by the asker could apply or not, the simple question was what were they? An answer could be, not allowed by forum policy to discuss, could be if said program can do the following... Some combination of the two or something else.

There is/was no interpretation of the question necessary by a third party. The question was clear... If there was concern about the potential response (no longer expected yet anticipated) then clarification about permissable response would have been appropriate, again something I didn't see as necessary. I believe the OP intelligent and more than likely knowledgeable enough to answer on their own behalf, to ask questions about what they are allowed to post if that were indeed an issue, or provide some response via PM if there was something permissable to state, but not so in the forum.

Regardless the question still stands.
Gonna say this, and then I really am done belaboring this any further.. if the question, and what you wanted to know was sooooo CLEAR, then the conversation that followed would not have been necessary..

Communication is only CLEAR when the folks engaged in it reach the same understanding... That DID NOT happen here, and yet you still want to insist that it did.. So to that I say simply this..

OKAY.. as you wish.. Carry on..