"Stock by Attributes" (version 1.5.3). This MOD is ONLY for v1.5.1 ..whaddda?

[dgcdesign]

Not sure SBA for v1.5.4 is ready just yet....
Take a look at the commercial option I mentioned.. It's working NOW! (search google for "Products' Options' Stock Manager 1.5.3")

Thank you for that direction. I've just sent the developer an email with questions. I appreciate your time.

[mc12345678]

Does anybody have a working sample site using the Stock by Attributes with ZC 1.5? Please, I need to give an answer to my client ASAP about the possibility of what they want.

Thank you for that direction. I've just sent the developer an email with questions. I appreciate your time.

Curious, what are the questions?

[DivaVocals]

Curious, what are the questions?

I think he was referring to questions directed to the developer of the Products Options Stock Manager module..

[mc12345678]

I think he was referring to questions directed to the developer of the Products Options Stock Manager module..

Obviously. But are they just to see the operation of the program on someone else's site, or are they about the program? Thus far the only question posted here is to see the program in operation. Question I asked wasn't about who was asked something, but what was asked.

[DivaVocals]

Obviously. But are they just to see the operation of the program on someone else's site, or are they about the program? Thus far the only question posted here is to see the program in operation. Question I asked wasn't about who was asked something, but what was asked.

Well except for asking to see it in action on another site (which the author provides a demo site for this purpose) not sure he can ask too many questions HERE about the Products Options Stock Manager module as it is a commercial module..

[mc12345678]

Well except for asking to see it in action on another site (which the author provides a demo site for this purpose) not sure he can ask too many questions HERE about the Products Options Stock Manager module as it is a commercial module..

I don't know what the issue is with asking to know what the questions are. More than likely the questions would be related to functionality, and as such the same questions could be asked about SBA. There is no reason that the same question(s) couldn't be asked here, hence the question. Please explain the push back on the most recent OP being asked to identify the questions that have been asked regarding a program that has already had initial inquiry.

[DivaVocals]

I don't know what the issue is with asking to know what the questions are. More than likely the questions would be related to functionality, and as such the same questions could be asked about SBA. There is no reason that the same question(s) couldn't be asked here, hence the question. Please explain the push back on the most recent OP being asked to identify the questions that have been asked regarding a program that has already had initial inquiry.

Oh goodness dude.. I'm not pushing back on anything.. I was merely trying to clarify for you why the OP might NOT have posted his questions regarding a COMMERCIAL module on THIS forum.. Now if what you are REALLY after here is for the OP to pose the SAME questions, but apply them to SBA instead, your prior posts TRULY do not CLEARLY lead one to conclude this..

[mc12345678]

Oh goodness dude.. I'm not pushing back on anything.. I was merely trying to clarify for you why the OP might NOT have posted his questions regarding a COMMERCIAL module on THIS forum.. Now if what you are REALLY after here is for the OP to pose the SAME questions, but apply them to SBA instead, your prior posts TRULY do not CLEARLY lead one to conclude this..

It's no problem, but I didn't ask anyone to violate the guidelines of the forum and asked my question to maintain brevity considering I have been told time and again I write too much. Already this issue has taken 6 additional posts to say follow the rules...

[DivaVocals]

It's no problem, but I didn't ask anyone to violate the guidelines of the forum and asked my question to maintain brevity considering I have been told time and again I write too much. Already this issue has taken 6 additional posts to say follow the rules...

It took 6 posts because you weren't CLEAR in your FIRST post that what you REALLY wanted was to know if the SAME questions being asked about a commercial module that is similar to SBA could be asked/applied with regards to SBA.. It's not just brevity that is important my friend.. CLARITY is important as well..

[mc12345678]

Doesn't matter if the questions as perceived by the asker could apply or not, the simple question was what were they? An answer could be, not allowed by forum policy to discuss, could be if said program can do the following... Some combination of the two or something else.

There is/was no interpretation of the question necessary by a third party. The question was clear... If there was concern about the potential response (no longer expected yet anticipated) then clarification about permissable response would have been appropriate, again something I didn't see as necessary. I believe the OP intelligent and more than likely knowledgeable enough to answer on their own behalf, to ask questions about what they are allowed to post if that were indeed an issue, or provide some response via PM if there was something permissable to state, but not so in the forum.

Regardless the question still stands.