Quote Originally Posted by Scott_C View Post
Its possible Im wrong here and didnt have an option set up properly or something.... but whether I'm wrong or right is really beside the point.
Still in denial eh.

I really did have you sussed out all along. I did the work for you, I've positively identified the error in your data, and I still get a slap in the face because I wasn't 'nice' to you. Just can't satisfy some people.

I would have been much nicer if you didn't lace your statements with what we both know were outright lies designed to make your claims appear more valid than they were.

Quote Originally Posted by Scott_C View Post
The issue as I see it Rod, is that you're continually rude
You call it rude. I call it being bluntly honest. I have no need or reason to tolerate bullshot from you (or anyone else for that matter).

The simple fact is, you gave the bull, I called you on it. You only have yourself to blame for your obvious embarrassment.

Quote Originally Posted by Scott_C View Post
but with the diatribe i received from you Ive decided to ditch it and seek another method entirely.
And this is supposed to hurt me somehow? I've already stated in my very first reply to you that YOUR attitude was almost enough to make me not want to help you in the first place. My mistake (and I really don't make that many) was ignoring my own gut feeling and attempting to help you anyway.
I won't make that mistake with you again.

I'd like to say I won't make the same mistake with others either, but it is in my nature to give everyone a second chance. You had yours and you blew it. (twice)

Quote Originally Posted by Scott_C View Post
So...dont bother replying (or do I dont care) - I wont be reading it.
LOL, the thing is, I am apparently a better judge of character than you are ... I *know* you are reading this ... you simply can't help yourself.

That is your nature.

Just as it is my nature to call a spade a spade.

Rod.