Zen Cart Logo
Forums / Templates, Stylesheets, Page Layout / Padding (I think) issue, IE vs FF

Padding (I think) issue, IE vs FF

Locked

Views: 834

Results 1 to 4 of 4
This thread is locked. New replies are disabled.
27 Dec 2009, 8:13 PM
#1
charinlasvegas avatar

charinlasvegas

Zen Follower

Join Date:
Jan 2009
Location:
Vegas Baby!
Posts:
311
Plugin Contributions:
0

Padding (I think) issue, IE vs FF

LINK

In FF, the header background image & the navigation menu which appear beneath it are lined up perfectly. In IE, it's off by maybe 2 pixels on the right. I'm not sure if this is actually a padding issue or not, or what to change in the stylesheet to fix it in IE & not have it go off in FF.

#headerWrapper, #logoWrapper, the table that the menu is in??? The measurements for everything are correct, 940 pixels.

Any ideas?

TIA

27 Dec 2009, 8:32 PM
#2
charinlasvegas avatar

charinlasvegas

Zen Follower

Join Date:
Jan 2009
Location:
Vegas Baby!
Posts:
311
Plugin Contributions:
0

Re: Padding (I think) issue, IE vs FF

sorry, nevermnd, I thought of a work around.

27 Dec 2009, 8:59 PM
#3
gjh42 avatar

gjh42

Black Belt

Join Date:
Jul 2005
Location:
Upstate NY
Posts:
21,876
Plugin Contributions:
8

Re: Padding (I think) issue, IE vs FF

You do realize that in a 1024x768 monitor, the phone number in the upper right of the header image is off the screen with no way to see it? If you have a flexible width page, the header ought to be able to shrink to accommodate the minimum you let the rest of the page work for.

And obviously in this case, a two pixel offset becomes utterly irrelevant.

27 Dec 2009, 9:11 PM
#4
charinlasvegas avatar

charinlasvegas

Zen Follower

Join Date:
Jan 2009
Location:
Vegas Baby!
Posts:
311
Plugin Contributions:
0

Re: Padding (I think) issue, IE vs FF

gjh42:

You do realize that in a 1024x768 monitor, the phone number in the upper right of the header image is off the screen with no way to see it? If you have a flexible width page, the header ought to be able to shrink to accommodate the minimum you let the rest of the page work for.

And obviously in this case, a two pixel offset becomes utterly irrelevant.

Ummm, no I didn't realize it - forgot to check :blush: I'll move it over, thanks.