Zen Cart Logo
Forums / Other Business Topics / Hoping to pick the brains of some old pros!

Hoping to pick the brains of some old pros!

Views: 6,170

Results 561 to 580 of 624
25 Jan 2013, 19:17
#561
divavocals avatar

divavocals

Totally Zenned

Join Date:
Jan 2007
Location:
Los Angeles, California, United States
Posts:
10,011
Plugin Contributions:
3

Hoping to pick the brains of some old pros!

niccol:

I am trying really hard not to say that the fact that you all can't agree on the 'observations', let alone any interpretation of those facts, kind of supports my earlier point that this is all a bit flawed. I am trying to find a way not to be entirely negative but it is kind of hard.

I think that a reasonable point that perhaps is all that comes out of all of this is that:

'Keywords in the URL seem to have less effect, either positive or negative, than many of the other factors in play.'

Which actually most of us agreed with from the start...nods in agreement to all of this:yes:

25 Jan 2013, 19:17
#562
sph avatar

sph

Totally Zenned

Join Date:
Jan 2006
Posts:
1,556
Plugin Contributions:
0

Re: Hoping to pick the brains of some old pros!

Well then, if everyone might see different results, can this test still have benefit just looking at my own entries? How my own sites stack-up against one another, which is what I think you suggest...doing our own tests.

Unfortunately I don't have a native url entry that has yet been found by google (it's one of my subdomain "demo" entries.)

25 Jan 2013, 19:18
#563
sph avatar

sph

Totally Zenned

Join Date:
Jan 2006
Posts:
1,556
Plugin Contributions:
0

Re: Hoping to pick the brains of some old pros!

DivaVocals:

nods in agreement to all of this:yes:

Okay then. I'm considering launching another site and may just as well stay with zencart native urls, even though MY results show CEON worthy of serious consideration.

BTW, Diva, what do you see? Do the human readable urls hold up well?

25 Jan 2013, 20:59
#564
bn17311 avatar

bn17311

Zen Follower

Join Date:
Apr 2010
Posts:
319
Plugin Contributions:
0

Re: Hoping to pick the brains of some old pros!

anybody confirm this is what they are seeing

search +"Wurldbitzer Debibulator" +"Lain led and fact none"

USA
UK
IRELAND
CANADA
AUSTRAILIA

and with omitted results included

USA
UK
IRELAND
CANADA
AUSTRAILIA

bn

25 Jan 2013, 23:24
#565
sph avatar

sph

Totally Zenned

Join Date:
Jan 2006
Posts:
1,556
Plugin Contributions:
0

Re: Hoping to pick the brains of some old pros!

BN, your US result is similar to mine. Here are two recent screen shots:

25 Jan 13 : http://www.promdressesforless.us/images/results-pic-3.jpg

22 Jan 13: http://www.promdressesforless.us/images/results-pic-2.jpg

But, yes, dramatic difference because of location. I know see why Rod, down under, thought that he and the native urls were "winning". :)

Since we three are so wide-spread geographically, I think that we're only competiting with our individual selves, with our own several entries.

26 Jan 2013, 06:44
#566
rodg avatar

rodg

Deceased

Join Date:
Jan 2007
Location:
Australia
Posts:
6,263
Plugin Contributions:
4

Re: Hoping to pick the brains of some old pros!

niccol:

you guys do know about pws=0 ?

http://www.rankpanel.com/blog/google-search-parameters/

It's one of those many fine details I've long forgotten

  • :laugh:

Thanks for the reminder (and the link)

Cheers
Rod

26 Jan 2013, 07:08
#567
rodg avatar

rodg

Deceased

Join Date:
Jan 2007
Location:
Australia
Posts:
6,263
Plugin Contributions:
4

Re: Hoping to pick the brains of some old pros!

SPH:

I know see why Rod, down under, thought that he and the native urls were "winning". :)
:smartass:

SPH:

Since we three are so wide-spread geographically, I think that we're only competiting with our individual selves, with our own several entries.

This has been made particularly worse in the last week or so. Something, somewhere us redirecting all my google.com requests back to google.com.au

BTW, I found the 'Australian connection' to our store. We have both the vcsweb.com and vcsweb.com.au domain names. The .com.au is an alias of the .com, which is why I'm seeing these up top when connected to the .com.au servers.

Niccol:

I am trying really hard not to say that the fact that you all can't agree on the 'observations', let alone any interpretation of those facts, kind of supports my earlier point that this is all a bit flawed. I am trying to find a way not to be entirely negative but it is kind of hard.)

Au Contraire, The observation that we are not all seeing the same results for 'equal' search queries is something we can agree on

  • :D , but this was something we already determined at the very start.

It seems I'm the only one seeing the** significantly different **results (which was only noted in the last week or so), and I think I've identified the cause.

Yes, there are many 'flaws' in these tests, but once I get back on track and start seeing near similar orderings as everyone else we can once again start looking for 'patterns' (if any) in our results.

Cheers
Rod

26 Jan 2013, 13:06
#568
feznizzle avatar

feznizzle

Totally Zenned

Join Date:
Apr 2010
Posts:
900
Plugin Contributions:
0

Re: Hoping to pick the brains of some old pros!

<unlurk> > **RodG:** > > This has been made particularly worse in the last week or so. Something, somewhere us redirecting all my google.com requests back to google.com.au You can cloak your IP. Or better yet, switch IPs around so that you appear to be based in the different regions where you want to see results.

RodG:

BTW, I found the 'Australian connection' to our store. We have both the vcsweb.com and vcsweb.com.au domain names. The .com.au is an alias of the .com, which is why I'm seeing these up top when connected to the .com.au servers.
Also your site base currency is Australian Dollar.
</unlurk>

26 Jan 2013, 14:39
#569
divavocals avatar

divavocals

Totally Zenned

Join Date:
Jan 2007
Location:
Los Angeles, California, United States
Posts:
10,011
Plugin Contributions:
3

Re: Hoping to pick the brains of some old pros!

SPH:

BTW, Diva, what do you see? Do the human readable urls hold up well?Not sure what you mean by "hold up well". If you are asking me about the results from this "test" my position on this hasn't changed.. I think the results are flawed for all the reasons I have said before.. But if you are asking me, based on my experience with my client's, do I see that human readable URLs matter/make a difference..:smile: then the answer honestly is no, I don't.. However, I also don't see them hurt anything either.. So I do not push my client's one way or another. The reasons to use re-written URLs originally had EVERYTHING to do with the search engines inability to handle the native URLS and the parameters in these URLS. That's no longer the case. Search engines accept BOTH native/dynamic and rewritten URLs without consequence.. So IMHO, it's a MINOR factor.

I continue to advise my clients that if they are desiring human readable URLs for anything other than having nicer URLs for print materials, that they are deluding themselves if they think human readable URLs are the "quick get rich SEO trick" that will suddenly make their site JUMP in the search engine results. Once I help my client understand that there are MANY factors to search engine rankings, and that SALES not TRAFFIC are the things they should be chasing after, I try to guide them towards concentrating their efforts on creating good content to attract customers and NOT to be an "ambulance chaser" who chases after search engines.

Google, Yahoo, and Bing are NOT going to give away their secrets so any "quick get rich SEO tricks" to search engine success are pure fantasy. So most of my successful my client's aren't as obsessed about search engines as they are about spending their time (wisely) making sure that they focus on creating GOOD content for their sites versus chasing after search engine algorithms. If the content is lousy or not at all unique, who cares whether or not the daggone URL is a human readable one or a native/dynamic (whatever you want to call it) URL??

Good content also isn't copying the manufacturers description and hoping for the best. This only leads to one's site being swallowed up in the sea of competing websites who've done the same silly thing. So my clients focus on what their target audience is looking for based on their knowledge of their customers and their knowledge of the products they are attempting to sell. This means using the manufacturers description as the BASIS/SOURCE for writing their OWN content, and not simply relying on the manufacturer to describe what they are selling. To quote Melanie Prough on this topic:

Do not duplicate manufacturers descriptions or anyone else's for that matter. If you haven't the time to create your own content in order to sell your products you are in the wrong business.

That said, for some folks, writing content is not something they can easily do themselves. To that I say that this is where a wise business owner will think about INVESTING in his business and HIRING (gasp) someone to help write their content. I know the idea of spending money for professional services is not looked upon favorably by most of the DIYers who frequent this forum. However, IMHO a smart business person recognizes that they may not have ALL the skills needed to do ALL the things they need to do. Free tool or not, sometimes you DO have to spend money to make money. This may mean hiring a graphic artist, or someone to help configure modules and other customizations, or even a writer to create product and category content. Unfortunately for many, Zen Cart being free leads to an attitude that EVERYTHING that they do to their site should also be free. This is ironic since the sites using this free tool are using it to MAKE MONEY.. (and before anyone gives me the "small business, no budget" argument.. save it.. Anyone who goes into business and is not prepared to invest SOME money into getting it setup is just going to be in for SOME struggles.. if these owners are not prepared to roll up their sleeves and get it done or simply admit that they need help.. well.. anyway you get the point..) There are SOOO many ways to pay for help without breaking the bank if one is willing to think a little outside the box. I have a client who makes use of college students as an inexpensive resource for example. oDesk and other sites like it are another resource.

but I digress a little here...

There's no ONE factor that is THE key to search engine success.. It's not JUST about finding THE template, it's not JUST about the images, it's not JUST about URLs.. The fact is that it is about working, looking, refining, getting customer feedback, knowing your target audience, knowing your product, and making changes based on these concrete pieces of data.. Looking for that one IT factor like templates and URLs is IMHO a waste of time, and I advise my clients to NOT waste their time chasing search engine results.. They need to chase their CUSTOMERS get SALES.. BTW, that is NOT one and the same thing.. However, if they chase the customer and capture them, the result SHOULD be that the search engine results will probably reflect a good outcome. To quote Melanie (in part) on this:

Use SALES, NOT traffic as your measurement.
and..
Easy SEO Summary

  • There is NO easy SEO.
  • SEO cannot be automated.
  • SEO is hard work.
  • SEO requires common sense and research.
  • There is no plugin, module or magic dust that will make you rank.
  • If you make changes without analysis, you have failed.

and

but most of the SEO you need is really common sense. Imagine if Google was your business, what kind of websites would you want to deliver your searchers (customers)? Hard work, lite reading and an overall drive to be successful are exactly what every shop owner needs to succeed. If someone told you this was going to be easy..... They lied!
and finally..
So this means, those of you seeking out the quick get rich SEO trick are pissing up a rope... The very rope that will be used to hang your website out to dry.

Do I see that the URL matters?? NOPE.. I do see that content does. The ones who spend time constantly refining their product and category descriptions, making GOOD use of the built in Zen Cart product and category meta data, refine their websites user experience, spend their time finding good ways that they can make GOOD use of social media, have "boots on the ground" style sales/marketing plans in place are the ones who do the best in sales (which is why they are able to successfully support themselves and their families on the revenues they earn from their websites).. The ones who are looking for and relying on quick get rich SEO tricks to bring in customers and sales are still waiting for their ship to sail in (which is why their businesses are still PART TIME businesses)..

Do not expect to rank for the keywords in your urls without good old fashioned on page relevancy support for them.... You would just fail.

I quoted a fair bit from Melanie's site.. That's because IMHO, Melanie Prough's website is a veritable CORNUCOPIA of GOOD SOLID information.. There are two articles I quote REGULARLY to my clients who start down the "I need nice URLs for the search engine" road.. It usually gets them back on the right path.
http://pro-webs.net/blog/2010/02/10/easy-seo/
http://pro-webs.net/blog/2009/09/10/zen-cart-seo-12-steps/

Here's something else to consider.. (and yet ANOTHER reason to not rely on search engine results as the ONLY measure of success) Google changed the game at the end of last year by jumping into the "pay for results" game.. Melanie speaks about it in this article:
http://pro-webs.net/blog/2012/12/13/scroogled/

Many of you shop online.... Most of you have used the super helpful Google shopping results in your regular searches when buying things online. They are helpful, you get a picture and to compare prices BEFORE even visiting the website.

Until recently these results have been free for merchants who follow the rules to send their products in for product search. So you can get good results from websites who are providing Google honest data about their products such as UPC numbers, prices, shipping, taxes etc.

Google recently announced that by the end of summer these results, will no longer be the quality merchants you have come to see here, but rather only merchants to PAY GOOGLE to be there.

So Google used the backs of merchants to build YOUR TRUST in their shopping results only to "beef" up their value to turn around and SELL THEM to merchants. They built a product with your trust only to turn and sell it off to the highest bidder.....

and Bing has come up with a HILARIOUS campaign (and funny videos) on this topic..
http://www.scroogled.com/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_6bSCW_UI0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fanf_5v3mkQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WIluNt0mvA

I'm not a Bing fan (don't LOVE it, but I don't hate it either), but they make a VERY valid point about this new shift at Google.. (anyone see the irony in Microsoft pointing fingers at folks and crying foul?? :laugh:)

26 Jan 2013, 15:48
#570
niccol avatar

niccol

Totally Zenned

Join Date:
Apr 2009
Posts:
2,138
Plugin Contributions:
1

Re: Hoping to pick the brains of some old pros!

why don't we have this smiley (http://goo.gl/WAl5a) on this forum?

26 Jan 2013, 16:05
#571
divavocals avatar

divavocals

Totally Zenned

Join Date:
Jan 2007
Location:
Los Angeles, California, United States
Posts:
10,011
Plugin Contributions:
3

Re: Hoping to pick the brains of some old pros!

niccol:

why don't we have this smiley (http://goo.gl/WAl5a) on this forum?
:laugh: Very funny!!!

26 Jan 2013, 17:09
#572
sph avatar

sph

Totally Zenned

Join Date:
Jan 2006
Posts:
1,556
Plugin Contributions:
0

Re: Hoping to pick the brains of some old pros!

Well, this morning for the first time everything looks hay-wire in my google results. I'm speaking of the general search, going to the end to click to show the omitted duplicate results. Some 956 results as of now.

Nothing looks as it did for me. My CEON entry is no longer King, even among my own entries. My two "main" sites - prommart and fashion-mart - are mid-page 2, below Rod's three product entries. BN's onyourbike and cscycles both rank above my main two sites.

My highest ranking link is not even the test product itself but an "ancillary link." Rod's highest ranking link is also an "ancillary link."

Don't know what to make of this.

26 Jan 2013, 17:10
#573
sph avatar

sph

Totally Zenned

Join Date:
Jan 2006
Posts:
1,556
Plugin Contributions:
0

Re: Hoping to pick the brains of some old pros!

Diva, thank you for the post! And your time and effort.

26 Jan 2013, 18:14
#574
bn17311 avatar

bn17311

Zen Follower

Join Date:
Apr 2010
Posts:
319
Plugin Contributions:
0

Re: Hoping to pick the brains of some old pros!

SPH:

BN's onyourbike and cscycles both rank above my main two sites.

it must be last latest mod i added,

bn

26 Jan 2013, 18:42
#575
sph avatar

sph

Totally Zenned

Join Date:
Jan 2006
Posts:
1,556
Plugin Contributions:
0

Re: Hoping to pick the brains of some old pros!

bn17311:

it must be last latest mod i added,

bn

Well, I do see your latest, improved text on onyourbike. Looks like that is working. Good job!

BTW, I have our test entries bookmarked, so have not yet clicked on actual google results.

26 Jan 2013, 20:08
#576
bn17311 avatar

bn17311

Zen Follower

Join Date:
Apr 2010
Posts:
319
Plugin Contributions:
0

Re: Hoping to pick the brains of some old pros!

niccol:

why don't we have this smiley (http://goo.gl/WAl5a) on this forum?

i think this smiley has been banned in uk

Every Little Helps

bn

27 Jan 2013, 18:08
#577
sph avatar

sph

Totally Zenned

Join Date:
Jan 2006
Posts:
1,556
Plugin Contributions:
0

Re: Hoping to pick the brains of some old pros!

My second test product on fashion-mart was just found and shot up ahead of my other entries. I added some bullet point text and bolded the WP in the main text:

http://www.fashion-mart.biz/blush-homecoming/wurldbitzer-debibulator-p-757

Still, an ancillary link from fashion-mart picking up my WP text banner is my highest ranking link when going to omitted results, in my results and looking at the original description.

Note: Simple SEO URL added the p-757 to the url, so as not to duplicate the original test product url.

27 Jan 2013, 18:51
#578
sph avatar

sph

Totally Zenned

Join Date:
Jan 2006
Posts:
1,556
Plugin Contributions:
0

Re: Hoping to pick the brains of some old pros!

Here's something interesting. Captitalization apparently makes a difference.

Three tabs open:

  1. "wurldbitzer debibulator" shows the same results as all caps "WURLDBITZER DEBIBULATOR"

  2. But "Wurldbitzer Debibulator" (first letter caps each word) shows a different search result.

Maybe something to keep in mind when entering keywords and what customers are likely to use?

27 Jan 2013, 19:46
#579
divavocals avatar

divavocals

Totally Zenned

Join Date:
Jan 2007
Location:
Los Angeles, California, United States
Posts:
10,011
Plugin Contributions:
3

Re: Hoping to pick the brains of some old pros!

SPH:

Here's something interesting. Captitalization apparently makes a difference.

Three tabs open:

  1. "wurldbitzer debibulator" shows the same results as all caps "WURLDBITZER DEBIBULATOR"

  2. But "Wurldbitzer Debibulator" (first letter caps each word) shows a different search result.

Maybe something to keep in mind when entering keywords and what customers are likely to use?
Someone can correct me if I am wrong.. but I'm pretty sure that capitalization is NOT a factor in search engine handling/ranking of search results.. WHY?? Because some folks type in all caps as a matter of habit, like wise for folks type in all lower case.. You can't predict which way folks will interact with a computer, so I am sure this is a NON factor.. It would stand to reason that search engines take into account this behavior into their algorithms..

Now for usability and readability, one would use caps only if it is appropriate, and the usage needs to be consistent.

27 Jan 2013, 19:56
#580
sph avatar

sph

Totally Zenned

Join Date:
Jan 2006
Posts:
1,556
Plugin Contributions:
0

Re: Hoping to pick the brains of some old pros!

I'm surprised also, but see a difference with my own eyes.

Open three browser tabs/windows and do three searches:

wurldbitzer debibulator

WURLDBITZER DEBIBULATOR

Wurldbitzer Debibulator

Then go to end to show omitted duplicate results.

Do you see a difference with first letters caps?

Or maybe it's just a google server thing with different servers, as Rod mentioned ealier.