Zen Cart Logo
Forums / General Questions / Anyone use Algozone Fraud Screen Service (AFS)?

Anyone use Algozone Fraud Screen Service (AFS)?

Locked

Views: 1,953

Results 1 to 4 of 4
This thread is locked. New replies are disabled.
3 Jun 2008, 8:31 AM
#1
markw10 avatar

markw10

New Zenner

Join Date:
Feb 2007
Posts:
53
Plugin Contributions:
0

Anyone use Algozone Fraud Screen Service (AFS)?

Has anyone here used the Algozone Fraud Screen Service (AFS)? More information about it can be found here:
algozone.com/shop/oscommerce_fraud_protection.php

I see that for example it does a lot to get IP addresses and find a risk based on that, the buyer's email, even the phone number of their credit card and determines a fraud risk. The cost seems low if you do high volume since you can purchase a large quantity of these for a low price. I'm just wondering if anyone has used it and has any opinions.

3 Jun 2008, 10:46 AM
#2
stevesh avatar

stevesh

Black Belt

Join Date:
Feb 2005
Location:
Lansing, Michigan USA
Posts:
19,793
Plugin Contributions:
2

Re: Anyone use Algozone Fraud Screen Service (AFS)?

If it works as well as their Zencart templates, you'll be out of business in no time, anyway, so just get the 400 queries for 1.99.

3 Jun 2008, 11:14 AM
#3
swguy avatar

swguy

Administrator

Join Date:
Feb 2006
Location:
Tampa Bay, Florida
Posts:
10,701
Plugin Contributions:
56

Re: Anyone use Algozone Fraud Screen Service (AFS)?

stevesh:

If it works as well as their Zencart templates, you'll be out of business in no time

ROTFL!! Quite funny.

3 Jun 2008, 11:54 AM
#4
misty avatar

misty

Inactive

Join Date:
Apr 2004
Location:
UK
Posts:
5,752
Plugin Contributions:
1

Re: Anyone use Algozone Fraud Screen Service (AFS)?

Agree with stevesh/swguy..
just a pity that this firm and a.n.other can get away
with selling sub standard templates that leave purchaser
sometimes thinking there is problem with zencart, when in
fact their hard earned dollars have bought them a
pig in a poke.
I would not pay 'em $1.99 for 4,000 queries.
:censored: