
Originally Posted by
DrByte
So ... despite the absence of much feedback, changes to support HTML5 and fix (important) validation errors have now been built-in to the new responsive_classic template. So responsive_classic is HTML5 out-of-the-box.
Further, template_default also passes HTML5 validation (if the html_header is changed to output HTML5 headers).
The changes to template_default were basically just to move a lot of table-related markup into CSS. While template_default does still contain a "layout" table in tpl_main_page, for the most part the rest of template_default uses tables just for actual tabular data.
Bookmarks